Wednesday, 14 August 2013

Crowdsourcing; open for business



The lure of the crowd

Facebook, eBay, AirBnB all use the crowd almost totally in their core business.  Some of the more conventional companies Amazon, Huffington Post and Gilt Groupe use it too. 

Should you?

Crowdsourcing is an emerging tool for firms using the internet for businesses, extremely powerful when used correctly.

If Henry Ford’s moving assembly lines created the modern factory in the industrial age, crowdsourcing is the equivalent in the information age, creating new-era factories using data as raw material, manufacturing informational and quasi-informational products and adding value to physical ones.  Instead of factory workers, it is us, the consumers who willingly and unwittingly become the factory hands.  Ford’s assembly lines upped productivity eight times and as others adopted and improved on it, it raised global productivity significantly, one of the great unheralded innovations. 

Crowdsourcing will do more. 

Wikipedia with only a few full time employees is ten times bigger than Encyclopedia Britainica and is roughly the same in accuracy from a study by Nature.  The other factories of today, Google, Alibaba, Sohu are generating profits through crowdsourcing..

This post in three parts explores the role crowdsourcing plays as businesses begin to use the digital channel to increase sales.

What is crowdsourcing?

Factories gave rise to modern consumerism.  We consume.  Now it is the turn of the consumers!  We produce. 

Crowdsourcing is a method that engages mainly the public to contribute resources, mostly effort, voluntarily in the production process.  It is done through the internet.

It can be for a design (GPS system for BMW), software (open source), information (Wikipedia), expertise (Quora), funding (Kickstarter) and other uses yet to be pioneered. Data makes up a huge part.  Crowdsourcing is being used indirectly by social enterprises (Google +, Twitter) to curate data which is then monetised.  For these modern innovators, it is business via the crowds. 

In short, with crowdsourcing you use the crowd to do something for you.

A website using it in effect sources manpower from the crowd to populate it, thus crowdsourcing.  It can be a conscious effort or unconscious, for profit or non-profit.  The crowd can be the public or groups of common interest.  They can also be companies.  It is usually symbiotic.

The term website is used but unlike web 1 era when they were mostly front covers of annual reports, websites today is about business.

I also define a crowdsourced site as one that depends on resources outside the organisation.  This is in contrast to conventional firms that rely mostly on internal resources for the production of goods or services.

A bit of history cements understanding of this important modern business tool

While a recent term, crowdsourcing was used in the genesis of the internet.  A defining event was when the concept for an RFC was created.  Traditionally tech design is carried out by a single team within an organisation but with the internet a different approach was taken.  The community around Arpanet (the predecessor of the internet), the group of participating researchers from universities, government and private entities conceived the RFC concept.  An initial design is written up and circulated among the community for comments, therefore Request For Comments (RFC). This resulted in an iterated ‘extragroup’ design.  In effect it facilitated a team effort of diverse groups and individuals totalling hundreds within and without.  Anyone can participate, even a new recruit, not just the few key engineers.  Working with unforced participants outside the core team became an operating culture of the early internet.  This developed further. When an engineer or two conceive an idea, he specifies the design into an RFC which is openly published, seeding it, effectively inviting anyone anywhere ie. globally to contribute to the development of that idea.  This was how all the design specifications of the internet were done then, even today, unconventional as it is.  This entered the working culture of the internet industry today.

While this is not quite a public crowdsource-design but that of a special interest group, you can say the same today of Wikipedians.  And of eBay.  And the seeding effort to draw in the crowd is how Facebook became a global phenomenon.  The foundation is laid.  Contrast this to the traditional committee-based decision making process where meritocracy is trusted only within, not without.  But that’s before the internet that made reaching the 0.001% (see next post) of the crowd of experts or the like-minded easily and cheaply.  In fact the RFC model influenced more than crowdsourcing, it laid down the roots for the internet industry’s culture of openness and furthering the democratic, bottoms-up and collaborative nature.  Initiatives on the internet today tend to reflect these norms. 

But I think while this early manner reflected human behaviour by nature independent while community-oriented, the modus operandi of organisations then (and now) was very much encapsulated in the 1956 best seller, “The Organisation Man” by William H. Whyte.  A central tenet of the book is that average Americans subscribed to a collectivist ethic rather than to the prevailing notion of rugged individualism” according to Wikipedia.  The collectivism is within the organisation he belongs to, hence organisation man.  I interpret this book as influenced by the machinery of the industrial age.  Factories and management needed this ethos to get their products produced efficiently.  The RFC process perhaps (I’m no social scientist!) reflects a change in society back towards individualism, breaking down the traditional collectivist ethic that innately trust internal resources and thus confidence in individuals within and without.  This may have something to do with the shift from the industrial to the information age we are now in since the latter empowers the individual.

As the internet took hold, user generation first became evident with newsgroups (circa 1979) intensifying with blogs (1994), both of content.  In 1999 there were 23 blogs and by the middle of 2006, there were 50 million blogs.  It accelerated with the introduction of the web (1993).  Free email services added to it but they had no value then.  Ditto gopher, the early ‘search’.  This wave began the commoditisation of information and monetisation a bit later.  Open source (a topic of a future post) while known mostly as a software movement but is actually a generic production model took crowd production beyond content.  From internet software, it has been used in books and video (film) and in time to come, become generic in application.

So much for how crowdsourcing came about, in the next post, why crowdsourcing works in the context of modern society and progressive business will be examined.



©Chen Thet Ngian, internetbusinessmodelasia.blogspot.com (2013).  Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Chen Thet Ngian and internetbusinessmodelasia.blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.



Monday, 12 August 2013

Washington Post & Jeff Bezos



When news broke (6 August 2013) that Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post, a presenter from Bloomberg West suggested that Amazon is moving towards the media business, never mind that it was a personal investment.  Similarly when LinkedIn bought Pulse, the press then asked if LinkedIn was re-strategising and moving into the media business.  

I don’t think so. 

To me LinkedIn et al are simply using a strategy of information.

It is about using information to support their core business, what I term as surrounding their products with information.  Content is the means to the end, not the end.  This plan adds value.  They understand the mechanics of the information age.  In LinkedIn’s case, it’s done for user engagement – using relevant content to tempt users to the website more often.  With the newsfeed showing increasing number of members commenting by referencing LinkedIn’s own content eg. Influencers’ post shows the strategy working.  LinkedIn gets the internet business model.  Maybe I should buy their shares!

In the information age, smart companies use information to drive business.

What do you think?

Friday, 12 July 2013

Mobile (data) Roaming; does it makes sense?



Some celcos provide roaming plans for internet access.  What do you make of it?


This post discusses mobile data roaming in the context of the internet era and suggests that the traditional telco business model is a misnomer when applied on internet access.  This blog discusses the emerging business models for those using the internet for business.  Internet ‘laws’ are applied to roaming to analyse its application in this post.


With mobile phones, you can subscribe to a local service when abroad to make calls but what about receiving calls, with the number your family and business associates are familiar with?  Roaming solves that.  With internet access, you can subscribe to a local service when travelling and you can still receive your email, your WhatsApp messages to the id everyone knows of.  Roaming is not required. 

Roaming is a telco/celco model, it doesn’t make sense with the data (internet) model. The telco model is a local model (mostly), the internet model is by nature global.  Remember the early days of the internet when everyone talked about the borderless world?  We now see one of the business ramifications.  By ‘local’ I mean the traditional telco categorising a local component and then other components (eg. international) in their business model, differentiating it with the fundamentally borderless internet.  The distance-based costing and partner-based (roaming) pricing used by telcos for voice seems out of place with internet services.  Without the local model, the concept of roaming seems a misnomer since roaming needs two locations; the home country and a foreign country.

Let me further clarify this local-global divide.

When you want to access a website, do you first ask yourself if you really need to if it is located in another country like what you would do with phone calls?  Would you access a website less like you would send less sms to a friend who is vacationing overseas because there’s a higher cost?  If you were looking to rent data centre space for an online service, would you not consider one in a foreign locale (cheaper perhaps) even when your users are from your country of origin?  Would you even think of that if it is for a voicemail (say dating site) service?

Another example is when a company buys connectivity.  When you order a leased line, distance is a cost factor besides bandwidth.  But when you buy broadband, you only pay for the bandwidth you want.

With the internet, there is no such thing as a local-global divide.  Unlike telco switches, there are no customs officers waiting to levy a charge when a voice packet arrives at a different telco’s switch so that that packet can pass through.  An internet packet simply recognises the user (Gmail address, Whatsapp id) and delivers it without fuss.

So the telco model is a local model in that it prices for a local service and then adds fees for components outside it.  Unlike paying voice calls in terms of local, national, international and roaming rates, you do not pay a different rate to send a message internationally with the internet model.  Well, you don’t even pay but that’s another twist of the differing business model but I hope the point between local-global divide is made. 

Because internet access doesn’t differentiate between the local or international component ie. borderless, the concept of data roaming is odd.

Roaming is another relic in the internet economy we’ve just entered.  At best, this is short term.  There’s a bigger issue.  A friend who just returned from Seoul said “There is good quality public wifi everywhere so I used Viber for making phone calls and WhatsApp for messaging”.  He didn’t subscribe for data roaming, he didn’t pay his local celco anything.  I think that’s a glimpse of the future of the industry!  But there’s some way to go for this to be replicated globally.  Perhaps telcos/celcos should put on their long term strategic planning cap on the data (internet) business, not voice, by first delving into the mechanics of the internet economy.

The benefit I see of data roaming is simply convenience if you are willing to pay for it.  The convenience is that when you travel you don’t have to bother with looking for and registering for data services.  But they shouldn’t call this roaming.  And they should really lower the prices.



©Chen Thet Ngian, InternetBusinessModelAsia.blogspot.com (2012, 2013).  Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Chen Thet Ngian and InternetBusinessModelAsia.blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.